- Feb 1, 2010
- 189
- 3
I hope that blue car is supercharged... i think it weighs like 6800 lbs LOL
LOL! all kidding aside, they're a very popular car, Ford has a winner there, as lot's of wimmin buy them!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I hope that blue car is supercharged... i think it weighs like 6800 lbs LOL
Thanks Manny!
What range would the fly-wheel horsepower be in? Just curious.
Ron
Ok now I'm seriously jealous. Love the build. Nicks Caddy sounds like it's gonna be insane!! How comfortable are you with the stock bottom end LS-6 and the 9-10lbs of boost?
Manny: I am anal with numbers. RWHP is certainly more significant than BHP. However, with a 15% parasitic loss as you indicated from flywheel to rear wheel I figure the following:
653 x (15%) .15 = 97.95.
653-97.95=555.05 RWHP as per dyno readout. Am I out to lunch! (653 BHP)
Can't wait to see final pictures and then the old "girl" in the "flesh".
Outstanding build Manny.... congrats.
Look at all that early torque....wow.
With a great tune (Kevin) I am running around with 19lbs of boost on a stock LS2...for 3years..... and a lead foot to boot.
Tony , if I wasn't confortable the build would have not happened .
With an alkycontrol kit (meth) we can still squeeze an easy 100 + RWHP and still be safe
So your shipping your car to me when
Sorry Manny i didn't mean the question that way. I was really meaning to ask if there was any real additional risk to be concerned of in comparison to the standard 6-8 lbs I've heard guys running. I have to say that the additional boost really makes a difference!!!
That looks like a great build Manny! Those are some serious numbers. What a rush that car must be!