Elections Canada - Please Read post Number 1

Across multiple reputable polls, the most relevant figures are:

  • 57% of Canadians are satisfied with Carney’s performance as Prime Minister (Postmedia–Leger, April 24–26, 2026).
  • 58% approval rating in Angus Reid polling on his first year in office.
  • 64% say he met or exceeded expectations on improving Canada’s international reputation (Angus Reid).
  • 57% say he met or exceeded expectations on diversifying trade (Angus Reid).
 
Across multiple reputable polls, the most relevant figures are:

  • 57% of Canadians are satisfied with Carney’s performance as Prime Minister (Postmedia–Leger, April 24–26, 2026).
  • 58% approval rating in Angus Reid polling on his first year in office.
  • 64% say he met or exceeded expectations on improving Canada’s international reputation (Angus Reid).
  • 57% say he met or exceeded expectations on diversifying trade (Angus Reid).
Depends on your definition of reputable I suppose. The thing about polls in general is that there are so many on most topics you can usually find one that agrees with your own perceptions......
 
Further to my earlier post regarding the new Sovereign Wealth Fund, Have a listen to this....


The term that comes to mind is fiscal mismanagement. Especially over the past 11 years . This new scheme reeks of corporate welfare at the end of the day. If any project makes economic sense the private sector would be investing without taxpayer money incentives. This will not end well. As usual. JMHO .
 
The term that comes to mind is fiscal mismanagement. Especially over the past 11 years . This new scheme reeks of corporate welfare at the end of the day. If any project makes economic sense the private sector would be investing without taxpayer money incentives. This will not end well. As usual. JMHO .
And here is another opinion of the fund
 
And here is another opinion of the fund
We shall see........ as for this being an investment vehicle for Taxpayers, any information on how that would work is missing. They did though I believe say that it would come with no chance of losses . Lol. If that's the case , when the inevitable losses occur who's paying for that ? Rhetorical question....
 
There are many opinions. A line from that link contains an important statement.

"Sovereign wealth funds are nothing new globally and even among Canadian provinces, but are usually financed with excess cash such as oil revenues."

Alberta has a Heritage Trust fund financed mostly by profits from oil and gas royalties. Right now it sits at about $36 billion. Would be more but we use if for healthcare, education, social programs and infrastructure.

Carney's fund is financed with Canadian taxpayer funds which should be used to pay down our national debt instead of increasing it. Although some here (well one at least), will say debt is a good thing, but compare it to our Corvette buyers who financed their cars. Your interest is compounding at a rate that you will never pay your loan off....Indeed, you aren't even able to keep up with interest alone payments. You will be in debt for the rest of your life, and your debt will get passed on to to your children. That is the status in Canada and many countries who at some point in time, their money will become almost worthless. What do you think buying a new car will coast when our dollar is worth 20 cents on the world stage.
Canada's dept is currently at just under $3 trillion dollars and the interest alone is compounding at a rate of around $250 million PER DAY! Where do you think Carneys $25 billion initial deposit is coming from? It's taxpayer money, not excess money from profits or investments. We have no hope in hell of ever keeping our debt under any semblance of control (not that we are even trying to make payments), and all our government is doing is moving money from one pocket into another and wants us to just keep filling both of them.

And we wonder why every year the provincial interest in separation from Canada increases. Especially for the provinces footing the bill.... Not sure what Quebec's excuse is though as they would be pissing away $14 billion in free equalization money if they separated.
 
There are many opinions. A line from that link contains an important statement.

"Sovereign wealth funds are nothing new globally and even among Canadian provinces, but are usually financed with excess cash such as oil revenues."

Alberta has a Heritage Trust fund financed mostly by profits from oil and gas royalties. Right now it sits at about $36 billion. Would be more but we use if for healthcare, education, social programs and infrastructure.

Carney's fund is financed with Canadian taxpayer funds which should be used to pay down our national debt instead of increasing it. Although some here (well one at least), will say debt is a good thing, but compare it to our Corvette buyers who financed their cars. Your interest is compounding at a rate that you will never pay your loan off....Indeed, you aren't even able to keep up with interest alone payments. You will be in debt for the rest of your life, and your debt will get passed on to to your children. That is the status in Canada and many countries who at some point in time, their money will become almost worthless. What do you think buying a new car will coast when our dollar is worth 20 cents on the world stage.
Canada's dept is currently at just under $3 trillion dollars and the interest alone is compounding at a rate of around $250 million PER DAY! Where do you think Carneys $25 billion initial deposit is coming from? It's taxpayer money, not excess money from profits or investments. We have no hope in hell of ever keeping our debt under any semblance of control (not that we are even trying to make payments), and all our government is doing is moving money from one pocket into another and wants us to just keep filling both of them.

And we wonder why every year the provincial interest in separation from Canada increases. Especially for the provinces footing the bill.... Not sure what Quebec's excuse is though as they would be pissing away $14 billion in free equalization money if they separated.
It's deficit financing no matter how you dress it up . I can't quite grasp the " logic" given our large debt which just continues to grow. Compounding interest is fantastic when you are receiving it , not so much when you are paying it .
I used a Visa card for many years for business purchases and always paid it in full on time . On one statement not long after it became mandatory for credit card issuers to disclose it the time to pay off that month's total only making the minimum payment was .......118 years ! Now imagine our National debt. Now imagine an increase in the BOC rate which is no doubt coming. Surprisingly it didn't increase at the last setting. I will read the pending post showing how great our fiscal position is later.......
 
Last edited:
It's deficit financing no matter how you dress it up . I can't quite grasp the " logic" given our large debt which just continues to grow. Compounding interest is fantastic when you are receiving it , not so much when you are paying it .
I used a Visa card for many years for business purchases and always paid it in full on time . On one statement not long after it became mandatory for credit card issuers to disclose it the time to pay off that month's total only making the minimum payment was .......118 years ! Now imagine our National debt. Now imagine an increase in the BOC rate which is no doubt coming. Surprisingly in didn't increase at the last setting. I will read the pending post showing how great our fiscal position is later.......
Well.... for anyone who doesn't understand Canada's debt... Or thinks it's a good thing, have a quick look at this. Don't take too long a look. It's costing us $167,000 each minute.... :(

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top