Elections Canada - Please Read post Number 1

Across multiple reputable polls, the most relevant figures are:

  • 57% of Canadians are satisfied with Carney’s performance as Prime Minister (Postmedia–Leger, April 24–26, 2026).
  • 58% approval rating in Angus Reid polling on his first year in office.
  • 64% say he met or exceeded expectations on improving Canada’s international reputation (Angus Reid).
  • 57% say he met or exceeded expectations on diversifying trade (Angus Reid).
 
Across multiple reputable polls, the most relevant figures are:

  • 57% of Canadians are satisfied with Carney’s performance as Prime Minister (Postmedia–Leger, April 24–26, 2026).
  • 58% approval rating in Angus Reid polling on his first year in office.
  • 64% say he met or exceeded expectations on improving Canada’s international reputation (Angus Reid).
  • 57% say he met or exceeded expectations on diversifying trade (Angus Reid).
Depends on your definition of reputable I suppose. The thing about polls in general is that there are so many on most topics you can usually find one that agrees with your own perceptions......
 
Further to my earlier post regarding the new Sovereign Wealth Fund, Have a listen to this....


The term that comes to mind is fiscal mismanagement. Especially over the past 11 years . This new scheme reeks of corporate welfare at the end of the day. If any project makes economic sense the private sector would be investing without taxpayer money incentives. This will not end well. As usual. JMHO .
 
The term that comes to mind is fiscal mismanagement. Especially over the past 11 years . This new scheme reeks of corporate welfare at the end of the day. If any project makes economic sense the private sector would be investing without taxpayer money incentives. This will not end well. As usual. JMHO .
And here is another opinion of the fund
 
And here is another opinion of the fund
We shall see........ as for this being an investment vehicle for Taxpayers, any information on how that would work is missing. They did though I believe say that it would come with no chance of losses . Lol. If that's the case , when the inevitable losses occur who's paying for that ? Rhetorical question....
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top