The W.H.O. said the only way to beat it down was TEST - TEST -TEST
The countries that did it from the get go have pretty well accomplished that.
In the mean time most of the more advanced countries, including Canada, are trying to get by asking people how they are feeling today. LMAOROFL, except it is not funny.
A little bit of money, comparatively, at the beginning would have saved one hell of a lot of dinaro being spent now to shore up the economy. Oh well, I guess the governments will pay for it. Wait a minute, we are the government.
Bet you the GST goes up pretty soon but maybe not before the next election. We the people will pay the government largess off in no time.
I agree.
But here's the problem with testing (or testing at the beginning) and opening the economy:
When all this first started, I was dealing with the NS gov't on initiatives to get us going and keep us safe. Nothing "high level", just dealing with my local politicians. Not satisfied with the answers I was getting (do politicians ever have a good answer?) from them or those up the chain from them, I moved on to researching and reading. After a few conversations with some local medical experts (doctors, virologists, etc, friends of mine from my university days) about advocating for 100% testing (NS is under a million in population) to separate those with from those without, I discovered that the tests (when this first started) could not identify an "asymptomatic" person, a "carrier" or even a positive if the subject was not already showing a a fever. So basically, the first tests we had couldn't tell you if someone had covid or not until they were showing symptoms. Too late at that point, they've already been spreading the virus. Pointless for anything besides telling the med professionals that your fever wasn't just a fever and that you actually had covid and needed to be isolated ASAP. So you could have been contagious for a week or more and not know it, without even showing a "positive" on a test. So politics and money aside, testing everyone at that phase would have been pointless since a "negative" test may actually be a "positive" and you woudl be sending that individual back out into the general population.
Now we have (IIRC) a test that can show you a positive in roughly 45 mins, but that doesn't address the "asymptomatic" and "carrier" cases. Not to mention, we're well past the point where "testing for containment" is going to be effective. Where we are now, it would be like closing the barn doors after the cows got out. It also becomes a problem if you are thinking you can test and send the negatives back to work. One "carrier" or "asymptomatic" gets out into the population and we're blowing up all over again.
Sadly, this thing is going to be a factor in our lives until we find a vaccine that can protect us from it or we actually get to a point where the virus can be considered "contained". The only way to control it right now is to not give it fresh hosts (ie: new infections), which means we're going to be distancing for a while yet. We simply do not have nothing else that's effective against this thing.....yet.
Hopefully, it's not like other diseases where a vaccine has yet to be found. Remember SARS? That's actually a coronavirus as well. In fact, it's full name is SARS-COV and/or SARs-COV1 and Covid-19's full name is SARS-COV2. Coivd-19 is actually SARS, it's just a more virulent strain in the same family. SARS-COV1 was 2003 and it also came from a bat species in China. There's
NO vaccine for that, even 17 years later. It's only considered "contained" at this time and that was done by the same measures we have in place now. It's just they nipped it in the bud when it started (in asia) with isolation and global cases only hit in the 8,000 range. We were (as a species) too slow to act this time so Covid-19 got out of control.
Sars-Covid1 was also droplet spread and highly contagious. The problem with SARS-Cov2 (Covid-19) is that it's every bit as contagious as SARS-COV1 was and then some.
Remember AIDS? No vaccine for that one and it's been around since the 80's.
So until a vaccine (or at least a mitigating strategy is developed, ie: medication to prevent death), we're stuck where we are.
Or accept that opening up is going to have a human cost......in lives lost.