That will work.
 

Attachments

  • 338006377_761506251952319_4532180585937681845_n.jpg
    338006377_761506251952319_4532180585937681845_n.jpg
    79.6 KB · Views: 45
Watch the video in the upper right corner. Just be patient for it to come up.

 
  • Agree
Reactions: BDK
fortunately in Canada, the shop owner would go to jail for defending himself. :)
I would have expected no less response from your demographic. God forbid, but if or when an armed criminal kills one of your relatives or friends, you might re-consider that self defense is a viable option to dying.
So... Is it the gun you don't agree with? If the shop owner had hit the assailant with a baseball bat, would it be fortunate that he would be jailed for that too? Just curious.
 
I would have expected no less response from your demographic. God forbid, but if or when an armed criminal kills one of your relatives or friends, you might re-consider that self defense is a viable option to dying.
So... Is it the gun you don't agree with? If the shop owner had hit the assailant with a baseball bat, would it be fortunate that he would be jailed for that too? Just curious.
I was poking the bear mostly.
It's a no win situation. If the robber had had a knife would that make a difference? He's still defending himself.
Is it worth killing over for money? (or whatever the robber was after)
Is it worth getting killed for money? (or whatever the robber was after)
Of course one could also argue the owner kept illegal weapons from getting on the street.
This is not the hill I want to die on. In this case I'd say he was justified, but I'd rather he just give the robber what he wanted, but it's really a no win situation. The robber could just as easily killed the owner.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rruuff Day
I was poking the bear mostly.
It's a no win situation. If the robber had had a knife would that make a difference? He's still defending himself.
Is it worth killing over for money? (or whatever the robber was after)
Is it worth getting killed for money? (or whatever the robber was after)
Of course one could also argue the owner kept illegal weapons from getting on the street.
This is not the hill I want to die on. In this case I'd say he was justified, but I'd rather he just give the robber what he wanted, but it's really a no win situation. The robber could just as easily killed the owner.
Agree....to a point. If the robber is unarmed, shooting him is overkill. But whether a knife, a gun or a baseball bat, you are fearing for yours and your families well being and possibly their lives which justifies a defense by whatever means necessary. If you fear for your life, you do what you need to do and if, in the process, you saved some innocent person in the next home or store they break into from getting murdered, I'm pretty sure there's still gonna be a place in heaven (or wherever you'd like to go) for you when that time does come. JMO
 
Looks like a wheel spacer gave out on that pickup. I hate wheel spacers!
Know the difference between spacers and adapters. Not sure what gave out here but..........????

Just spacers - no way! No way to keep the wheel properly centred.
1679937811718.png



Adapters with built in studs usually are OK! Depends who makes them.
1679937845440.png
 
Last edited:
Agree....to a point. If the robber is unarmed, shooting him is overkill. But whether a knife, a gun or a baseball bat, you are fearing for yours and your families well being and possibly their lives which justifies a defense by whatever means necessary. If you fear for your life, you do what you need to do and if, in the process, you saved some innocent person in the next home or store they break into from getting murdered, I'm pretty sure there's still gonna be a place in heaven (or wherever you'd like to go) for you when that time does come. JMO
I forget the word, but shooting a guy that threatens you with a baseball bat is not legal defense. It IS overkill. But even that has variables. If the guy is 6 foot 6 and he threatens my life with his fists then yes, I'd rather shoot him than die. But in the eyes of the law I'd have to have a reasonable fear that I would die to justify my use of a gun. Ya, it's difficult either way. If I died without shooting him, then I should have shot him. If I didn't die, but was just beaten then I shouldn't have shot him.
20 -20 hindsight. One never knows.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 BAD 9T9
I forget the word, but shooting a guy that threatens you with a baseball bat is not legal defense. It IS overkill. But even that has variables. If the guy is 6 foot 6 and he threatens my life with his fists then yes, I'd rather shoot him than die. But in the eyes of the law I'd have to have a reasonable fear that I would die to justify my use of a gun. Ya, it's difficult either way. If I died without shooting him, then I should have shot him. If I didn't die, but was just beaten then I shouldn't have shot him.
20 -20 hindsight. One never knows.
Does where you shoot him have any relevance?
 

Similar threads

Users who are viewing this thread