the FOOD FOR THOUGHT thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter YFCvii
  • Start date Start date
Bonhoeffer
Ignorance is not the same as stupidity. Ignorance arises naturally from not knowing, but it can be diminished with learning and experience. Stupidity, on the other hand, is an obstinate rejection of knowledge.
We are all ignorant in certain respects, because no one can know everything. But ignorance remains curable through instruction, unlike stupidity, which resists correction regardless of how much teaching is done.
Stupidity thrives the most in political and social systems where people adopt collective dogmas instead of exercising independent thought. This leads to widespread moral complacency.
The stupid individual, however, becomes a tool that can be manipulated to the will of others. They are unable to perceive harm as harmful, are blinded to truth, and can be exploited by those who want to control them.
The rise of political or religious power in any society correlates directly with the growth of societal stupidity. In such cases, the dominant authority depends on unthinking compliance from the governed.
 
Last edited:
bd6a86876bb6b433db9a4a01929a10089a41e2872d1ca0ed95abe1a704ac5fee.webp
 
An old guy in his car is driving home from work when his wife rings him.

"Honey", she says in a worried voice, "be careful. There was a bit on the news just now, some lunatic is driving the wrong way down the freeway".

"It's worse than that", he replies, "there are hundreds of them!"
 
Academic degrees signal training in a system of methods, not possession of truth. A doctorate in theology demonstrates fluency in doctrinal history, linguistic interpretation, bullshitology and philosophical argumentation within a defined tradition. It does not, by itself, establish the ontological claims of that tradition as accurate descriptions of reality. This distinction is often blurred in public discourse, where credentials are mistaken for epistemic immunity

1781289030280.webp
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top