Ls 502

i didn't see what length of rod was being used, only that a minimum 6.125 could be used. this would only give a rod/stroke ratio of 1.33. not very good. i wonder if they get around this with the tall deck and piston pin placement ?
 
i didn't see what length of rod was being used, only that a minimum 6.125 could be used. this would only give a rod/stroke ratio of 1.33. not very good. i wonder if they get around this with the tall deck and piston pin placement ?

Its an RHS tall deck block.
 
so with the tall deck the geometry will improve ? the piston pin placement bothers me too, awfully far into the ring groove. it seems quite similar to the ford 347 stroker which makes big power but has a fairly short life. i think if i had the bucks to put into one of these i would want to see how they last. just wonderin'. :D
 
If you want any info on this just give Bryan at LME a call. He just built my engine and is always eager to answer questions.
 

Similar threads

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top