Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Member Map
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
What's new
New posts
All posts
Trending
Latest activity
New media
New Events
New review items
New Users & BDays
New User Announcements
Birthday Announcements
New classified ads
New showcase items
New classified comments
New showcase comments
Classifieds
New ads
New comments
Latest content
Latest feedback
Latest questions
Advertiser list
Search classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Events
New events
Donate
My CCF
Toolbox
Mailing Lists
My Shop
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Showcase
New items
New comments
Latest content
Latest updates
Latest reviews
Author list
Series list
Search showcase
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Member Map
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Corvette
C8 Forum
Spoiler
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ddgermann" data-source="post: 141227" data-attributes="member: 3537"><p>I’m sure it would be no big deal for the average joe Eric but as an engineer you must fully get why GM is against interchanging as they designed for specific uses. Sanctioning people mixing it up could lead to some awefull legal problems for them. </p><p>How fast is too fast for a combination of aero? What about head and cross winds? </p><p>“Oh darn... I forgot to change the wing and splitter” as the car drifts into the ditch at 270. I’ll just sue GM... if I live. </p><p></p><p>What do the they say about engineers finally making something “idiot proof”? </p><p>Yup as soon as they do... god invents a better idiot. </p><p></p><p>I think I would get the ZTK package as it has track tweaks done to the suspension along with the aero.</p><p> I’m in the camp of “if you are going to drop the $ on the 755 HP track car... do it all the way.” </p><p>Nice to have choices in life isn’t it. Pretty sure there is no right and wrong as in the end it’s how it feels to the guy or gal driving it that matters. <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="😀" title="Grinning face :grinning:" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" data-shortname=":grinning:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ddgermann, post: 141227, member: 3537"] I’m sure it would be no big deal for the average joe Eric but as an engineer you must fully get why GM is against interchanging as they designed for specific uses. Sanctioning people mixing it up could lead to some awefull legal problems for them. How fast is too fast for a combination of aero? What about head and cross winds? “Oh darn... I forgot to change the wing and splitter” as the car drifts into the ditch at 270. I’ll just sue GM... if I live. What do the they say about engineers finally making something “idiot proof”? Yup as soon as they do... god invents a better idiot. I think I would get the ZTK package as it has track tweaks done to the suspension along with the aero. I’m in the camp of “if you are going to drop the $ on the 755 HP track car... do it all the way.” Nice to have choices in life isn’t it. Pretty sure there is no right and wrong as in the end it’s how it feels to the guy or gal driving it that matters. 😀 [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Corvette
C8 Forum
Spoiler
Top
Bottom
You're browsing as a
Guest
. Please register to receive all manner of go-faster benefits on CCF. Click
HERE
to login or register.